
The Office of Management and Budget published new federal rulemaking text in May 2026 that would allow political appointees to override peer review in allocating US research grants. This is the formalization of an August 2025 executive order — now merged with other administration priorities to survive legal challenge. If finalized, the change would end the peer-review system that made American science dominant for seven decades.
The draft rule states that “peer review remains advisory and does not replace agency discretion,” then directs agencies to fund grants “aligned with administration policies and priorities” rather than scientific merit alone. It also grants agencies unlimited power to cancel existing grants at any time if deemed no longer in the “national interest” — a vague standard with no procedural safeguard. The document bans funding for theories of disparate-impact liability, research on chromosomal disorders it labels “gender ideology,” and collaborations involving Chinese researchers. Domestic-first language requires that international elements be justified as a “last resort,” even with allied nations. Publishing in journals that require data sharing would also be blocked under proposed limits on conference attendance and dissemination costs.








